With
the exodus of Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder to the American League, conventional wisdom was that the
top hitter prices in the National League would shoot up. But - for the fourth
year in a row - the prices dropped a little.
Top 10 Salaries, 2012 N.L.
Hitters
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
$21
|
42
|
-20
|
44
|
40
|
41
|
41
|
$34
|
|
2
|
$24
|
41
|
-17
|
42
|
40
|
42
|
42
|
$53
|
|
3
|
$45
|
40
|
5
|
43
|
38
|
39
|
41
|
$47
|
|
4
|
$30
|
40
|
-9
|
43
|
37
|
39
|
38
|
$33
|
|
5
|
$26
|
37
|
-12
|
36
|
38
|
38
|
37
|
$35
|
|
6
|
$9
|
36
|
-28
|
35
|
37
|
37
|
36
|
$32
|
|
7
|
$25
|
36
|
-11
|
34
|
39
|
36
|
36
|
$16
|
|
8
|
$39
|
33
|
6
|
32
|
33
|
34
|
34
|
$28
|
|
9
|
$27
|
33
|
-6
|
34
|
33
|
32
|
27
|
$25
|
|
10
|
$29
|
32
|
-3
|
30
|
33
|
32
|
31
|
$24
|
|
Average
|
$28
|
37
|
-10
|
37
|
37
|
37
|
36
|
$33
|
Once again, CBS was the
culprit. The average salary for LABR and Tout ticked up slightly from 2011:
from $36 to $37 per player. CBS plummeted: from $42 down to $37.
The same thing happened in
the American League but the way it happened was
different. The prices on the top four hitters in the A.L. were actually lower
for CBS than they were for LABR/Tout. In the N.L., CBS pushed on Votto,
Kemp, Braun, and Gonzalez before quickly deciding to scale back.
For the second year in a
row, it could be argued that the N.L. experts on the whole didn't scale back
enough. These hitters received a $4 raise per player from their prior earnings,
despite healthy pay cuts for Kemp and Braun.
Some of this phenomenon is
caused by the fewer appealing options among everyday National Leaguers. The DH
has something to do with this, but a there's a belief among experts that the
last two years have seen an erosion of stats among the non-elite hitters in the
Senior Circuit.
Top 10 Hitters, National
League, 2012
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
Ryan Braun
|
$45
|
40
|
5
|
43
|
38
|
39
|
41
|
$47
|
2
|
Andrew McCutchen
|
$39
|
33
|
6
|
32
|
33
|
34
|
34
|
$28
|
3
|
$33
|
16
|
17
|
13
|
15
|
20
|
18
|
$15
|
|
4
|
$31
|
14
|
16
|
13
|
15
|
15
|
12
|
$16
|
|
5
|
$31
|
23
|
8
|
21
|
24
|
23
|
24
|
$28
|
|
6
|
$31
|
19
|
11
|
20
|
19
|
19
|
22
|
$6
|
|
7
|
$31
|
27
|
4
|
29
|
30
|
22
|
28
|
$17
|
|
8
|
Carlos Gonzalez
|
$30
|
40
|
-9
|
43
|
37
|
39
|
38
|
$33
|
9
|
$29
|
30
|
-1
|
30
|
29
|
30
|
32
|
$36
|
|
10
|
Matt Holliday
|
$29
|
32
|
-3
|
30
|
33
|
32
|
31
|
$24
|
Average
|
$33
|
27
|
5
|
27
|
27
|
27
|
28
|
$25
|
The earnings for the 10
best National League hitters plummeted last year. The $33 average earnings was
the lowest total since I shifted from 4x4 to 5x5 in 2009, and this was a severe drop
from 2011's $38 per player. Some of this drop was due to Braun and Kemp earning
a combined $100 in 2011. While it was mostly Kemp who didn't live up to his
end of the bargain, historically it is highly unlikely that hitters who earn
$40+ keep it up the following year.
This is the first time
since 2009 that 10 N.L. hitters failed to earn $30 or more. This made me
wonder, where did those earnings "go"? Did they distribute evenly
across the board, or did someone else benefit?
Earnings by
"Tier": 2012 versus 2011
2012
|
2011
|
+/-
|
|
Tier 1
|
$412
|
$467
|
-$55
|
Tier 2
|
$340
|
$346
|
-$7
|
Tier 3
|
$312
|
$280
|
$32
|
Tier 4
|
$269
|
$235
|
$34
|
Tier 5
|
$227
|
$206
|
$21
|
Tier 6
|
$187
|
$174
|
$12
|
Tier 7
|
$151
|
$152
|
-$1
|
Tier 8
|
$127
|
$129
|
-$2
|
Tier 9
|
$97
|
$105
|
-$8
|
Tier 10
|
$72
|
$79
|
-$7
|
Tier 11
|
$47
|
$59
|
-$12
|
Tier 12
|
$29
|
$35
|
-$6
|
Tier 13
|
$8
|
$5
|
$2
|
Tier 14
|
-$9
|
-$5
|
-$4
|
And the answer is: someone
else.
While the best hitters
weren't quite as good last year, it was the above average hitters (Tiers 3-6)
that outperformed their 2011 counterparts. The market was right to be
wary about the drop off in talent in the National League last year.
That's hindsight talking,
though. In the real world, there was plenty of value at the bottom, even if we
couldn't see it coming in late March.
Top 10 Profits, N.L.
Hitters 2012
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
$25
|
1
|
23
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||
2
|
$25
|
3
|
22
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
$10
|
|
3
|
$20
|
1
|
20
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
-$1
|
||
4
|
$21
|
3
|
19
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
11
|
$20
|
|
5
|
$24
|
6
|
19
|
5
|
8
|
4
|
6
|
||
6
|
Chase Headley
|
$33
|
16
|
17
|
13
|
15
|
20
|
18
|
$15
|
7
|
$17
|
0
|
17
|
1
|
R3
|
$0
|
|||
8
|
Aaron Hill
|
$31
|
14
|
16
|
13
|
15
|
15
|
12
|
$16
|
9
|
$17
|
0
|
16
|
1
|
R2
|
$4
|
|||
10
|
$17
|
2
|
15
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
$3
|
||
Average
|
$23
|
5
|
18
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
$7
|
There is always talent
floating around at the bottom; we just don't know what "trash" in the
end game is going to become treasure.
This was more apparent last
year than in any recent season. Seven of the 10 best bargains went for $3 or
less and four had an average salary of $1 or less. Some of the guys we were
wringing our hands about turned out to be pretty damn special.
If the Stars were OK, and
some of the scrubs were special, where should we have been cautious in
N.L.-only leagues?
Top 10 Losses, N.L. Hitters
2012
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
Troy Tulowitzki
|
$9
|
36
|
-28
|
35
|
37
|
37
|
36
|
$32
|
2
|
Joey Votto
|
$21
|
42
|
-20
|
44
|
40
|
41
|
41
|
$34
|
3
|
$2
|
21
|
-18
|
21
|
21
|
20
|
21
|
$29
|
|
4
|
Matt Kemp
|
$24
|
41
|
-17
|
42
|
40
|
42
|
42
|
$53
|
5
|
$3
|
19
|
-15
|
17
|
20
|
19
|
20
|
$19
|
|
6
|
$14
|
28
|
-14
|
28
|
27
|
28
|
26
|
$20
|
|
7
|
$6
|
19
|
-13
|
19
|
20
|
18
|
19
|
$16
|
|
8
|
$11
|
23
|
-12
|
24
|
22
|
24
|
22
|
$13
|
|
9
|
-$2
|
10
|
-12
|
7
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
$22
|
|
10
|
$9
|
22
|
-12
|
23
|
20
|
22
|
22
|
$22
|
|
Average
|
$10
|
26
|
-16
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
$26
|
Once again, if hindsight
tells us there was more value in the Tier 3-6 hitters, reality tells us that
there were plenty of busts in the $19-23 cost range.
The true value of the
hitters on the back end is on full display when you look at what the hitters did
versus what they cost.
Earnings vs. Cost: National
League Hitters 2012
SAL
|
$
|
+/-
|
|
Tier
1
|
$460
|
$351
|
-109
|
Tier
2
|
$341
|
$263
|
-78
|
Tier
3
|
$283
|
$244
|
-39
|
Tier
4
|
$242
|
$225
|
-17
|
Tier
5
|
$209
|
$232
|
23
|
Tier
6
|
$166
|
$152
|
-14
|
Tier
7
|
$138
|
$135
|
-3
|
Tier
8
|
$119
|
$114
|
-5
|
Tier
9
|
$89
|
$123
|
34
|
Tier
10
|
$63
|
$108
|
46
|
Tier
11
|
$47
|
$73
|
26
|
Tier
12
|
$31
|
$110
|
79
|
Tier
13
|
$18
|
$85
|
67
|
Tier
14
|
$10
|
$53
|
43
|
Total
|
$2,216
|
$2,269
|
As it turns out, National
League Roto players shouldn't have worried about where they were going to get
value at the bottom of the heap. They should have worried about overspending on
the hitters at the top.
Three of the 26 most
expensive hitters turned a profit for their owners. The 26 most expensive
hitters lost $188...or over seven dollars per player. I always argue that
losing money on the top players is an acceptable loss. This is not an
acceptable loss.
At the beginning of this post, I pointed out how some fantasy players were panicking over Pujols and Fielder. But the market was reacting not to them but to what happened in 2011. Check out the 2011 earnings
versus the 2012 salaries in the two charts above. Instead of suspecting that
the best hitters might earn less because some of the best hitters were gone,
the market just kept paying and paying and paying for an inferior batch of
hitters....I believe based on the assumption that the best hitters would fill up the vacuum almost entirely by themselves.
Even if they had stayed
healthy, Joey Votto and Troy Tulowitzki weren't going to make up for the value
lost to Pujols and Fielder leaving the league and Ryan Howard missing most of
2012. Unless a change in statistical context is radical, the change in
valuation is typically small. A $1-2 change per player due to a change in
context is more common than a $5-6 change.
My viewpoint on Pujols and
Fielder leaving leagues turned out to be on the nose. The hitting context didn't change
all that much. But instead of paying last year's best hitters close to last
year's values, the expert market pushed the prices up to 2011 par. And for
that, the expert market was bound to lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment