The story coming into 2012 was that first base was going to be a
monster position in the American League. Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder were
going to take an already strong position and make it even stronger. An
embarrassment of riches was going to be ours for the taking.
As
typically happens, the expectation did not match the reality.
Top
10 A.L. First Basemen 2012
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
Miguel
Cabrera
|
$40
|
39
|
1
|
39
|
40
|
39
|
39
|
$36
|
2
|
Prince
Fielder
|
$29
|
31
|
-2
|
31
|
32
|
30
|
33
|
$34
|
3
|
Albert
Pujols
|
$27
|
40
|
-13
|
39
|
41
|
40
|
40
|
$35
|
4
|
Mark
Trumbo
|
$22
|
11
|
11
|
7
|
14
|
12
|
11
|
$20
|
5
|
Paul
Konerko
|
$21
|
25
|
-4
|
21
|
26
|
28
|
23
|
$26
|
6
|
Adrian
Gonzalez
|
$19
|
35
|
-16
|
36
|
36
|
33
|
38
|
$36
|
7
|
Kendrys
Morales
|
$17
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
9
|
13
|
8
|
|
8
|
Adam
Dunn
|
$16
|
14
|
2
|
11
|
16
|
15
|
13
|
-$2
|
9
|
Mark
Teixeira
|
$16
|
29
|
-13
|
29
|
30
|
29
|
28
|
$24
|
10
|
Justin
Morneau
|
$16
|
7
|
9
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
11
|
$2
|
Average
|
$22
|
24
|
-2
|
23
|
25
|
25
|
24
|
$21
|
Did these guys blow the doors off of previous first base earnings?
Top
10 A.L. First Basemen: 2009-2011
Year
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
Prior Year
|
2011
|
$24
|
21
|
3
|
19
|
2010
|
$21
|
20
|
1
|
18
|
2009
|
$20
|
23
|
-4
|
23
|
Not
only did they not "blow the doors off," but last year's first basemen
couldn't even out earn their 2011 counterparts.
Some
of that, of course, are the elite disappointments. Pujols and Gonzalez were
both expected to provide $35-40 worth of value and both fell well short. But
even if Pujols and Gonzalez had met expectations, this group would have earned
$25 per player. Strong earnings, yes, but not the earth shattering numbers that
you would have expected based on the hype.
We
shouldn't have been too surprised
at this result. First basemen are historically overpaid in Roto, and 2012 would
turn out to be no exception.
10
Most Expensive A.L. First Basemen, 2012
#
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2011
|
1
|
Albert
Pujols
|
$27
|
40
|
-13
|
39
|
41
|
40
|
40
|
$35
|
2
|
Miguel
Cabrera
|
$40
|
39
|
1
|
39
|
40
|
39
|
39
|
$36
|
3
|
Adrian
Gonzalez
|
$19
|
35
|
-16
|
36
|
36
|
33
|
38
|
$36
|
4
|
Prince
Fielder
|
$29
|
31
|
-2
|
31
|
32
|
30
|
33
|
$34
|
5
|
Mark
Teixeira
|
$16
|
29
|
-13
|
29
|
30
|
29
|
28
|
$24
|
6
|
Eric
Hosmer
|
$14
|
27
|
-13
|
28
|
25
|
28
|
26
|
$23
|
7
|
Paul
Konerko
|
$21
|
25
|
-4
|
21
|
26
|
28
|
23
|
$26
|
8
|
Adam
Lind
|
$8
|
17
|
-9
|
16
|
15
|
19
|
17
|
$16
|
9
|
Adam
Dunn
|
$16
|
14
|
2
|
11
|
16
|
15
|
13
|
-$2
|
10
|
Carlos
Pena
|
$7
|
14
|
-6
|
11
|
13
|
17
|
12
|
$17
|
Average
|
$20
|
27
|
-7
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
27
|
$24
|
A
seven dollar loss per player sounds bad, but compared to recent history is an
improvement; A.L. first basemen have only returned 66 cents on the dollar from
2009-2011, or the worst
return of any position in
either the American League or the National League in that time.
To
its credit, the expert market knows this and doesn't go overboard. Instead,
they respond to the perceived quality at the position by flattening the price
on the hitters at the top. In particular, CBS - once a league of crazy, over-the-top prices on the top tier -
hangs back. They don't crack $40 on Pujols and are really conservative on
Konerko, Dunn, and Pena. This pays off on Konerko and Pena.
The
disappointments at the position aren't one size fits all. Pujols and
Gonzalez fail, but potential phenom Hosmer does as well.
One
reason this group tanks is that there isn't a lot of speed at the position. An
outfielder that fails as a hitter but still manages to provide 15-20 steals
still has some value. A lead-legged first baseman that can't run and that
doesn't hit is going to be nearly worthless.
Never
get attracted to the idea that a position is "strong" or
"weak." Changes in the landscape don't happen overnight, even if an
elite hitter or two is switching leagues. It's OK to pay big bucks for Pujols;
just don't pay well over his market value because he's a new fish.
No comments:
Post a Comment