Last month - when I set out to see if closers are overvalued - I discovered that first basemen are overvalued.
But only in the American League. From 2009 through 2011, the 10
most expensive first basemen in the A.L. year over year returned a mere 67 cents on the
dollar.
Why was this? What was happening that A.L. first basemen were such
poor investments?
Ten Most Expensive A.L.
First Basemen, 2011
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
CBS
|
LABR
|
TW
|
PK
|
2010
|
|
1
|
Miguel Cabrera
|
$36
|
39
|
-4
|
48
|
35
|
35
|
38
|
$38
|
2
|
Adrian Gonzalez
|
$36
|
36
|
-1
|
42
|
34
|
33
|
36
|
$27
|
3
|
Mark Teixeira
|
$24
|
35
|
-11
|
38
|
36
|
30
|
31
|
$25
|
4
|
Kevin Youkilis
|
$16
|
32
|
-17
|
35
|
33
|
29
|
30
|
$21
|
5
|
Adam Dunn
|
-$2
|
31
|
-33
|
34
|
28
|
30
|
24
|
$24
|
6
|
Paul Konerko
|
$26
|
25
|
1
|
30
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
$32
|
7
|
Billy Butler
|
$22
|
24
|
-2
|
27
|
22
|
23
|
25
|
$23
|
8
|
Kendrys Morales
|
22
|
-22
|
30
|
18
|
17
|
20
|
$9
|
|
9
|
Justin Morneau
|
$2
|
21
|
-18
|
26
|
16
|
20
|
20
|
$19
|
10
|
Derrek Lee
|
$8
|
17
|
-9
|
21
|
17
|
14
|
16
|
$17
|
Average
|
$17
|
28
|
-12
|
33
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
$24
|
Last year the position didn't suffer so much on the whole, but
rather was a population of haves and have nots. You would have been better off
with the lost season that was Kendrys Morales than with the season that was put
up by Adam Dunn. Morneau wasn't that much better. But while the good hitters at
first were good, only Konerko turned a profit. Miggy was a great player last
year, but he was still overpaid by Rotisserie standards.
Ten Most Expensive A.L.
First Basemen 2010
Rank
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
PK
|
ZIPS
|
2009
|
1
|
Miguel Cabrera
|
$38
|
$37
|
0
|
$36
|
$32
|
$31
|
2
|
Mark Teixeira
|
$25
|
$37
|
-12
|
$32
|
$26
|
$28
|
3
|
Kevin Youkilis
|
$21
|
$30
|
-9
|
$27
|
$23
|
$25
|
4
|
Justin Morneau
|
$19
|
$29
|
-10
|
$26
|
$26
|
$20
|
5
|
Kendrys Morales
|
$9
|
$27
|
-18
|
$24
|
$19
|
$27
|
6
|
Billy Butler
|
$23
|
$25
|
-2
|
$23
|
$23
|
$21
|
7
|
Carlos Pena
|
$12
|
$25
|
-13
|
$18
|
$21
|
$18
|
8
|
Chris Davis
|
$0
|
$16
|
-16
|
$13
|
$17
|
$9
|
9
|
Paul Konerko
|
$32
|
$15
|
+17
|
$12
|
$17
|
$18
|
10
|
Nick Johnson
|
$0
|
$12
|
-12
|
$9
|
$11
|
$15
|
Average
|
$18
|
$25
|
-8
|
$22
|
$22
|
$21
|
2010 was better, but not by that much. Konerko turned a huge
profit this time around, but Miggy was the only other player that (barely)
turned a profit. Eight out of 10 A.L. first basemen lost money, with six of the
10 losing money in double digits.
Ten Most Expensive A.L.
First Basemen 2009
Rank
|
Player
|
$
|
Sal
|
+/-
|
AP
|
SW
|
2008
|
1
|
Miguel Cabrera
|
$31
|
$38
|
-8
|
$30
|
$35
|
$33
|
2
|
Mark Teixeira
|
$28
|
$38
|
-10
|
$29
|
$33
|
$33
|
3
|
Justin Morneau
|
$20
|
$33
|
-13
|
$26
|
$26
|
$29
|
4
|
Kevin Youkilis
|
$25
|
$29
|
-4
|
$25
|
$21
|
$32
|
5
|
Chris Davis
|
$9
|
$27
|
-18
|
$21
|
$20
|
$15
|
6
|
Carlos Pena
|
$18
|
$22
|
-4
|
$20
|
$20
|
$21
|
7
|
Aubrey Huff
|
$9
|
$21
|
-12
|
$23
|
$15
|
$32
|
8
|
Carlos Guillen
|
$6
|
$19
|
-13
|
$16
|
$17
|
$16
|
9
|
Mike Jacobs
|
$7
|
$16
|
-9
|
$16
|
$7
|
$19
|
10
|
Paul Konerko
|
$18
|
$15
|
+3
|
$16
|
$14
|
$12
|
Average
|
$17
|
$26
|
-9
|
$22
|
$21
|
$24
|
We see the same cast of characters with some
of the same results. Cabrera is somewhat overrated...at least in Roto. Teixeira is way overrated, as is Morneau. Konerko continues to
be underrated until the market finally catches up and starts paying the man.
But who cares what happened in 2009? Back to my original question:
why have American League first basemen underperformed?
Some of the poor ROI here is due to the usual culprits: injuries, disappointing prospects, and fading veterans. This happens
at any position in baseball, and I'm not necessarily sure it happens more here.
But there's something else going on here. Players like Cabrera,
Teixeira and Adrian Gonzalez are overpaid.
It's counterintuitive to say that the 2010 edition of Cabrera or
the 2011 edition of Gonzalez is overpaid. After all, they broke even, and
getting your money back on a stud hitter is worth its weight in gold, right?
The problem in both cases is that betting in the mid to high $30s
on a player with no significant stolen base ability is like betting big on an inside
straight in poker. You might win the hand, but that doesn't mean you made a
good bet.
Cabrera has been an incredible baseball player the last three
years. But as amazing as his 38/126/3/111/.328 line was in 2010, that was
"only" good for a $38 season. There's a peak on what a player like
Cabrera can earn because he doesn't run. And if a player's batting average
normalizes (like Gonzalez's has this year), you're not going to pull that inside
straight.
The market also overpays for power. Mark Teixeira is a
three-category guy (runs, RBI, HR). But year after the year the market pays him
like he's a five category stud. He's not. While Tex is a solid source of power,
dropping this much of your Roto budget onto a one-dimensional power hitter takes resources away
from the steals and batting average you need to buy elsewhere.
In Rotisserie, identifying bargains is only half of the puzzle.
You also need to be able to identify market inefficiencies as well. The expert
market has generally overspent for one-dimensional power the last three years,
but particularly so in the American League at first base. It wasn't an accident
that I bought Casey Kotchman for $1 last year in the CBS expert league. Rather
than chase a first baseman past the point of possible return, I figured I'd
just hold my nose and throw a buck down on Kotchman. It worked like a charm but
even if it didn't I would have only lost $1 for my troubles, and not taken the
$12 loss that Cabrera's CBS owner took or the $14 loss that CBS's Teixeira
owner took.
2 comments:
The problem in both cases is that betting in the mid to high $30s on a player with no significant stolen base ability is like betting big on an inside straight in poker. You might win the hand, but that doesn't mean you made a good bet.
Except in poker there are pot odds and semi-bluffs that could make a bet have +EV for an inside straight. Those things don't exist in an auction.
Yeah, I could have written "is like betting big on an inside straight in poker when you don't have good pot odds and aren't in a good position to make a semi-bluff." But I suspect that the vast majority of my readers understood the analogy.
Post a Comment